A couple of weeks ago, the Rough Cut editors tag-teamed a free week of silent films at the Brunswick Bulleke-Bek Bootleg Cinema (BBBC), all screening at 6am at GalleryGallery Inc.
This is a dispatch from that program, but it is also about many other things, among them: the changing of the season, communion with the unspoken, cross-suburb friendship, decay, the phases of the moon, not being able to stop your stomach from rumbling in a quiet space, field noise, committing to the bit, bringing a thermos from home.
DAY 1 — FANCHON THE CRICKET (1915) — MONDAY, MAY 27
@tiia
At 4:45am, my first alarm sounds; I accidentally watch an Instagram story on full volume and wake up my partner sleeping beside me. My phone clatters loudly to the floor as I roll out of bed.
@indigo
I wake up at 5:15am and eat two probiotic gummies from a jar on my bedside table, as if this might wake me up.
![](https://roughcutfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/screenshot-2024-06-12-at-3.43.39e280afpm.png?w=447)
@tiia
GalleryGallery Inc. sits just off of Sydney Road in Brunswick. As @indigo and I approach the large, warehouse-type building, we see a window lit up in pink with a tarp advertising the Bootleg Cinema series. Above the entrance, a neon sign reads, simply, ‘MOVIES.’ It’s still dark. We are the first to arrive. We are met with coffee and pamphlets and friendly faces. We talk to someone’s mother (the mother of the curator and one of the event’s organisers, we learn) and try, feebly, to explain our commitment to attending each daily screening. We call it a diary. The film begins promptly at 6am. There is no musical accompaniment.
Starring Mary Pickford, Fanchon the Cricket was believed lost for many years until 2012, when the Mary Pickford Foundation learned that a nitrate dupe had been preserved at La Cinémathèque Française. Together, using an additional incomplete print from the British Film Institute, the organisations worked to restore it.
@indigo
In it, Pickford plays a wild girl, an untouched orphan in frayed clothing, who badly craves affection. She lives with her grandmother on the outskirts of a village and spends her days as a devotedly voyeuristic outsider to its festivities. Pickford’s Fanchon is feared by the others, because everyone had thought her mother to be a witch. She casts her sights on a man, Landry, with a doberman-like visage and a pressed collar, who is courting a woman with tightly looped curls.
Fanchon is transfixed by the rigid, paint-by-numbers courtship rituals that the couple stage in gullies and on riverbanks. It’s not that Landry is particularly attractive to her—the obsession feels arbitrary—but that, somehow, the possibility of all intimacy is contained in him. Pickford staggers between clownishness and tight-lipped severity. Her motions are jagged, impish, and expressionistic; her eyes are ringed and wanting.
In one scene, the villagers spread out in a field, sharing fruit in pairs, while Fanchon scowls at them from the top of a mound, cradling her very own apple. She contemplates throwing it, then reneges and bites into it, instead. She repeats this, rotating in petulant indecision, contemplating and biting until it’s too late; she’s holding a core.
“A sad heart,” reads one of the film’s interlaid cards. Another, simply “Eventide.” Fanchon moves between magenta, sepia, and blue.
![](https://roughcutfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/fanchon-the-cricket-colours.png?w=1024)
@tiia
The film tracks her from an outsider position to a state of romance-as-belonging. The coda to the film sees the actress in a field of long grass, thrashing in the wind. She prances up to the camera invitingly, greets us, then bids goodbye.
@indigo
This time, on the cusp of sunrise when most are asleep, is of course quiet, but it also feels uncomfortably loud. I feel sensitive to every jolt and rustle, to every wriggle in the cold cavern of the screening room. I am conscious of my leather jacket creaking at the elbows when I drink. Around me, other leather jackets rub against the leather couch. A security alarm sounds in increments, each time only once, as if testing the waters.
@tiia
At one point, we can hear someone singing to themselves as they stroll past the gallery warehouse on their way to somewhere else.
@indigo
The gaps between noises are much less heavily plugged than normal; sound doesn’t stream but gathers and pools in spots. A wake-up alarm twinkles, ascending, and is quickly put to sleep. Exercises in attention are always exercises in distraction.
DAY 2 — THE VALLEY OF SILENT MEN (1922) — TUESDAY, MAY 28
@indigo
I kept waking up during the night, thinking it was morning, and @tiia was outside my door, ready to pick me up. First at 11:30, then three, then four. It was even colder than yesterday, and I layered on wool, shivered to the car.
@tiia
I take a brief moment to stare up at the moon before leaving to pick up @indigo, around 5:30am (a waning gibbous, moongiant.com tells me later; 74% illuminated). Inside the cold warehouse, Tuesday looks like: a thermos of English Breakfast tea brought from home; trousers over thermal leggings; blankets provided for attendees. Outside, the morning sounds like: a garbage truck clanking and beeping; the Upfield line train periodically whizzing through the Hope Street level crossing between Brunswick and Anstey Station.
@indigo
The chill is apt; the film, The Valley of Silent Men (1922), is set in a below-zero landscape. It tracks the strange aftermath of the murder of an explorer, as a naively kind-hearted man, Kent, makes a faux confession from his (apparent) deathbed.
A dark-browed woman—Marette, daughter of a prophet—shows up in a swooping, fur-brimmed coat. A truth-seeker and a romantic (if one can be both), when Kent discovers he is well and is jailed, he breaks out and together they flee, scaling the mountain’s peaks, which fold over themselves like meringue. Marette slips into a crevasse, while Kent is slung to the other side of the mountain.
From afar, their ropes look like skeins of dental floss. Snow—especially in black-and-white, reduced to its near-nothing—makes everything stark, and it moves and satisfies me to watch the pair together and adrift, two dark bundles in a crumpled void of white, stumbling and sliding with a helpless beauty.
@tiia
The film was directed by Frank Borzage, who five years later would win Best Director at the first ever Academy Awards. Shot in the Rocky Mountains of Canada, it was later preserved by the Library of Congress National Audio-Visual Conservation Center in Virginia. The print from which the digital scan was produced had partially decayed in places, with two reels missing.
Through bleary morning eyes, the flaws of certain sequences—marred by what looks like blooming and blistering—take on a compelling quality of their own. In a story premised partially on lies and half-truths, the facades of the performers flicker in and out of coherence. Celluloid decay makes time and mortality appear to us with increasing sharpness; everybody in this film is likely dead, and here they are chemically withdrawing from the frame before us, their images made ghostly and unstable. The digital age fosters the illusion that images are eternal, yet this reminder of material fragility—in an era of overconsumption and abundance—is almost startling.
![](https://roughcutfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/film-damage-1.png?w=1024)
![](https://roughcutfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/film-damage-2.png?w=1024)
When I arrive home, the waning gibbous is still high in the brightening sky. It winks at me as I exit the car. Inside, the house is only just beginning to stir.
DAY 3 — WHAT HAPPENED TO JONES? (1926) — WEDNESDAY, MAY 29
@tiia
I realised early on that nearly all of the programmed films are easily accessible on YouTube. While I attend for the pleasure of watching them (and to expand my admittedly limited knowledge of the silent era), I also attend for the strangely intimate communal setup. Though it’s a free public program, by day three, slipping into the building in the cover of predawn darkness starts to feel like being in on a secret.
@indigo
The truth? Today is the day that my attention waivered. I was hungover and my stomach was making strange noises. This might’ve been appropriate, because we were watching a movie about a drunken buck’s night escapade, where the out-of-towner groom, who everyone is suspicious of, lives up to these suspicions in the course of a swirling trail of misdemeanours, performed alongside a Danny Devito-esque sidekick. The untrustworthy groom’s eyes are kohl-lined, as if set out in a bold font, and he has a brilliant, cheeky face. The bride is a shimmering pixie with a braid lapping her temples.
@tiia
The film’s series of hijinks include crossdressing, a stolen milk cart, bribery, and a character impersonating a bishop. The main performers, Reginald Denny and Otis Harlan, are incredibly game and expressive, embodying a comedic sensibility that, almost 100 years later, has dated very little. It is the only screening I attend that, despite the gentle atmosphere, elicits genuine, full-throated laughter.
DAY 4 — THE GOLEM: HOW HE CAME INTO THE WORLD (1920) — THURSDAY, MAY 30
@tiia
Due to our schedules, @indigo and I begin to attend separately.
Each morning, after the film begins at 6am, the door to the gallery is locked. Today, at 6:03, it is windy and I am late. I traipse up the stairs just behind two other fellow stragglers. They ring the doorbell (an old model, which must be manually turned) and we are let into the dark space a few moments later. The small viewing room is fuller than usual.
This is, I imagine, because Thursday’s film is much more well-known than the previous selections: a famous piece of Jewish folklore, in which a 16th-century rabbi creates a giant creature—the Golem, played by director Paul Wegener—out of clay, to protect the Jews of Prague from persecution. The power to grant life meets existential terror in a magical, grotesque display. While watching, the weather’s rough gusts rattle the gallery building, adding their own score to the unnerving expressionist dreamscape. The awakening of the Golem—a fantasy of protection that soon crumbles—is punctuated by whistles and creaks. During a fiery climax, in which the Golem wreaks havoc on his creators, all we can hear is clanging.
As the week goes on, I expect the mornings to feel a bit like a ritual. I expect them to feel almost like church; a congregation of quiet faithfuls, directing their collective attention at myths and visions. Initially, I expected the silence of the films to be a crucial part of this. In Waiting for God, Simone Weil writes that silence “is not the absence of sounds, but something infinitely more real than sounds, and the centre of a harmony more perfect than anything which a combination of sounds can produce” (154). In my overly grand imagination, I perhaps wanted things to feel like this, somehow divine. Due to the regular sounds of the street and building, we do not get silence; in fact, it’s a rarity to be so aware of the outside world filtering in during a film. This does not always, in the case of Tuesday’s relentless garbage truck, make for a particularly pleasurable experience, but it does make for a uniquely attuned one. Instead of holiness, the environment seems to offer something humbler: a calm alertness to the day. Call that whatever you want.
DAY 5 — THE SON OF THE SHEIK (1926) — FRIDAY, MAY 31
@tiia
By Friday, a week of poor sleep is catching up to me. As I enter the gallery, I overhear someone say: “We start on time even if no one turns up.” There is, of course, a small congregation of people. I am too tired to keep wholly awake; planted in the back corner on one of the couches, I wrap my scarf tightly around my neck and let my head loll from one side to another. I begin to miss some of the more overt disruptions—the soft shit, sorry! when someone’s phone alarm sounds—that have been keeping me attentive up to now.
I could not tell you much about The Son of the Sheik (an action-romance film, and one of the earliest prequels ever made), in which silent-era heartthrob Rudolph Valentino plays both Son and Sheik. Though I could tell you about its undercurrents: a bizarre racial and sexual politics (cinema’s familiar Orientalism; a romance borne from abduction) which mar the more enjoyable fight scenes between Valentino and his foes.
Here, mortality also tempts the frame—the film was Valentino’s last, before he died incredibly young, at 31, while promoting its release. “I feel,” Valentino allegedly once said, “quite unreal.” Many have claimed to see his ghost in the years since, haunting his old Beverly Hills mansion. One of the property’s caretakers, swept up in paranormal legend, rigged blinking lights to trick occupants into fear of his restless spirit.
After the film, I take photos of the vibrant pink sunrise and send them to @indigo. I sit in my car for a long time before finally driving off.
![](https://roughcutfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/441963827_1158951435353617_1461131592795949702_n-4.jpg?w=750)
DAY 6 — YOU NEVER KNOW WOMEN (1926) — SATURDAY, JUNE 1
@indigo
I walk today; the air is shifty and cold. A crescent moon is hanging as if from a string. Waking up at this hour makes me feel like I am going to the airport; it’s a destabilising feeling, but still precious, promising, like every second is part of an important transition.
Directed by William A. Wellman, You Never Know Women stars Florence Vidor as Vera, a cherubic, gauze cape-wearing butterfly impersonator beloved by her vaudeville troupe, particularly their resident Byronic escape artist, Norodin. She is also the object of a stoney investor’s obsession—a man who, in long stretches, we observe watching the troupe perform. He has an air of tortured discontent, but raps his cane on the floor when something finally pleases him—his way of scrambling to possess Vera, her world, and her show. The rest of the on-screen audience are enthralled: the kind of loose-jawed absorption one can slip into when they think they are not being watched, because this burden is being seamlessly deferred elsewhere, to the acrobats and clowns.
Looking feels especially kinetic when speech is unavailable. There’s a shot between a strongman’s legs, who is looking at Vera while balancing another woman on the soles of his feet.
In an early on-stage scene, the troupe’s members are revealed in a patiently curving pan, as they peel off their masks in sequence. Underneath is a second ‘mask,’ a theatrical, greasepaint smile, and it feels as if we could spin back to the beginning, again and again, forever. There is something about silence that seems to render a film both particularly fragile and somehow beyond the rhythms of time, like a self-sustaining trick of the light. Later, after the ‘family’ has been touched by grief, the same spinning-top shot recurs, but their expressions are now despairing; they stare deeply into the camera. There is a degree of blame directed towards the audience. For looking too closely? For not respecting the expanse between spectator and spectacle?
![](https://roughcutfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/you-never-know-women-still.jpg?w=1024)
By this point, the person I came with had crossed the threshold and begun snoring softly beside me.
I realise each day how tenuous looking-power really is, though, and think about how witnessing art is often more of a dispossession. In silence, when you’re this aware of your body—swallowing, digesting, rumbling—the comfortable confidence of being a seer becomes especially flimsy.
DAY 7 — GYPSY ANNE (1926) — SUNDAY, JUNE 2
@indigo
It’s Sunday. I think about absconding. I am afraid to walk to the gallery alone before dawn, so I splurge on an Uber. The driver has been working through the early hours, witnessing brawls on Chapel Street, and he is picking up some last little trips as he drifts back home. Perhaps because it is Sunday, and seven days have now cycled, the visitors to the screening room—which feels increasingly like a bedroom—seem to have settled into the routine of it all.
Gypsy Anne (directed by Rasmus Breistein and adapted from a short story by Kristofer Janson) is a Norwegian tale about a woman named Anne who, as an orphaned infant discovered in the barn of the industrious Storlien farm, was reluctantly taken into the fold of the owners’ family, becoming the adopted sibling of the farm’s heir, Haldor, with whom she spies on lovers and practises kissing as a mischievous child. Later, as an adult haunted by unbelonging, Anne herds goats and, when Haldor makes a controversial proposal and farmhand Jon gradually reveals his love, eventually sets the farmhouse ablaze.
The fire is a dark smog which textures the silhouettes of the hillsides behind it and stains the rest of the film red. It feels right for it to be soundless. It holds a consumptive serenity. As the characters confound one another with silent admissions, a memorable effect repeats: faces are framed in blurry-edged spotlights, which contract around expressions while all else blackens. Feeling lights and blots.
It’d be amiss to call this week of dawn cinemagoing tranquil. At first I’d experienced an increase in focus throughout my days, and had thought of these mornings as meditations. Now my body feels confused. Still, I’ve enjoyed the sense of awkward communion, the sheepishness of small talking with strangers shortly after waking, the laughter that has nowhere to hide, the breath becoming a score.
I call my mum on the walk home. I haven’t seen her in months, but I know that, because it’s Sunday, she’s going swimming.
Curated by Jake Wilson, the Silents Before Sunrise event marked the beginning of the BBBC’s 2024 program at Brunswick’s GalleryGallery Inc., which runs until July 13 and includes a diverse array of screenings of hard-to-find films, retrospectives, and filmmaker visits.
**********
Tiia Kelly is a film and culture critic, essayist, and the Commissioning Editor for Rough Cut. She is based in Naarm/Melbourne.
Indigo Bailey is a Tasmanian writer and editor living in Naarm/Melbourne. She has written for Island Magazine, The Guardian, Voiceworks, and Kill Your Darlings, among other publications, but first she was published by Rough Cut.